top of page

Geraldine Stephenson

Talk at the Jerwood Space on September 10th 2000

Summary of Talk 

Early Days, meeting Laban and teaching at the Northern Theatre School Bradford. The Sources of GS’s Dances. The Dream – A Dance Piece for Television. York Mystery Plays in 1951. AMS, Addlestone. Her career after leaving the AMS, Addlestone. Her early pageants. How she gets a group of people moving. Historical Dance.

The Talk

[She is she reading from a text at the beginning]

Early Days and Meeting Laban

‘My mother had heard that there was this new movement in dance called Central European dance. I had met nothing like the dance that was taught by Joan Goodrich at Bedford College of PT. One thing that particularly interested me we did was what was called central movement, as opposed to peripheral movement. It was a question of letting your whole body flow into a movement.  We also danced in partners which you don’t do in ballet classes, we improvised. This was new and different. We were beginning to move in areas of time space, weight and flow. Time: the two extremes are either very slow or very fast; Space being very big around you or small, being direct or being very flexible, weight being strong or light. These elements were very incredible to dance and to work with.

 

At one point in my third year you were expected to teach PT in a school. Well, I wasn’t a bit interested in that.  

 

The people at the Sheffield college. The psychiatrist with his extraordinary clothes. His was a deep movement.

 

The Principal said, I if you don’t teach at a school you are letting your country down.  I got a scholarship from my old school to go to Laban’s Studio of the Art of Movement in Oxford Street in Manchester. 

 

The there was a gap between the floor and wall in the Studio and you could see the traffic passing by. The so-called ‘big’ studio was really quite small, and then there was an even smaller one, the shower was filthy, but none of this mattered because we really loved the work. There were students from Norway, France and Switzerland. And the same thing that happened in Sheffield began to happen again. We worked on Eukinetics – the efforts - and Choreutics – concerning spatial information. Dance drama. Lots of percussion, making lots of sounds with different things – what Harrison Birtwhistle later worked on. I was there for seven years.  

 

I think the reason that Laban’s exercises were called efforts was to do with the way the word was used during the War – everything was a ‘war effort’. If you raised money, or worked in a canteen or knitted mittens for sailors this was your war effort.  So these actions in Eukinetics were called the efforts. 

 

Robert Stephens was in the first year at the Northern School of Theatre, Bradford.  

 

Laban and she would discuss their courses at the NST on Thursday evenings.   After most of the businessmen had left the train at Halifax they were left by themselves.  

The Sources of GS’s Dances

She’d assisted him at a drama course in York. I remembered the angels at the Minster Front and in the paintings – the different positions of their hands. The first piece was called angel at prayer and was performed to a Chorale Prelude by Bach, played on an old 78 RPM. I used tablaux. But felt that I need to find a contrasting piece to put with this, and while looking for this I found my father’s Masonic cloak in his wardrobe. I loved moving about in it. And this was how the angel of death or the bringer of death came about. This was from New Testament story when the angel comes and marks with a red cross the doors of those families whose first-born will be slaughtered. He used Mars from Holst’s The Planets. [Talks about Revolution]. The fourth piece was based on Henry Mayhew’s London Labour and the London Poor. He interviewed a number of street sellers and one of them was this little flower girl who described how she made up her posies and bouquets.  Then I did a series of clown series.  One of them was called Tea at Sea with problems with the rocking boat.  Another was a clown in a circus, another an Alchemist. Part of these dances were a way of getting over the fact that I was so tall.

The Dream – A Dance Piece for Television

Another dance was called The Dream. When I was a child I used to dream that I could fly over telegraph poles and roves. With this dance I auditioned at Alexandra Palace, then home of the BBC, for Christian Simpson, head of dance – such as there was. Two months later when I was back at the Studio in Manchester I was called to the phone – it was the BBC who wanted to film The Dream. I had to be Alexandra Palace at 10.00 am and I wasn’t called until 7.00pm. It was a horrible experience waiting all that time. Three years ago I got a letter from a woman who was undertaking a history of contemporary dance and had come across a review of my 8-minute piece by Lisa Gordon Smith – a very savage critic. Christian Simpson’s programme was called Choreography for Camera.

“The first item entitled The Dream was an interpretation by Geraldine Stephenson with an accompaniment of sound devised, we are told, by herself.   It could as well as have been a particularly vile piece of malice from the meteorological office for he heard the sighing of winds, the breaking of waves and the swooshing of rain. Geraldine Stephenson postured among clouds in the midst of a rotating prism.  [I had taken a little icosahedron with me (a twenty-sided crystal which Laban had devised in his studies of spatial movement).]  Dreadful as all of these ingredients sound there is but one thing to be said for about the finished product and that is that it succeeded in being a very fine piece of experimental television. One would not perhaps like to see such a thing too often, nor for too long. But as it stood it was a very interesting and quite enjoyable piece of entertainment and a solid paving stone in the path of tele-Ballet.”  

This was how I got my foot in the door of dance in television.

York Mystery Plays

The next big thing that happened was the York Mystery Plays.  However, when it came to the crowd scenes I was really flummoxed so I went to Laban for his advice. “Oh it’s very easy, divide a hundred into three lots of thirty, and then put the next hundred into groups of ten, and then put your students in charge of these groups.” Of course now we would expect more realism from our crowds, then the movement was much more stylised. We had problems in the Last Judgement in separating the good souls from the bad souls. Everyone wanted to be bad, because few people were keen on wanting to walk up the stairs to heaven.

 

From the time that I’d been in Laban’s course Sheffield I knew that I wanted to work in some way with this approach to movement. My experience in York made me realise that that is what I wanted to do: choreograph and direct. I had learned such a lot about the use of space, floor patterns and that sort of thing.

AMS, Addlestone

The Studio moved to Addlestone and I took one look at the building and knew that I wouldn’t be staying – it was too much in the country. It was just what Laban and Lisa wanted and just what I didn’t want. I was just about to start doing all these different things and then here we were lost in the countryside. I lasted one year there. Then I did two days, then one a week, and it got less and less until it was one day a year.

 

Her career after leaving the AMS

So then I was in London looking for work with theatre companies.

 

I had lived with Lisa and Laban and experienced all the problems with the acceptance of their kind of work. Then it was all Ballet – Martha Graham had not yet come to Britain, and when she did there were only a few people in the audience: Robert Helpman and Katherine Hepburn. The audiences were so small that she didn’t come back for ten years, and it was during that time that we were doing all these strange things. Audiences were worried about this curious movement that was going on, people wanted something more harmonious after the war. And somehow Laban’s work wasn’t being accepted – he wasn’t being accepted and he said to me before I left. “Never use my name, it will be of no use to you.” This was a terrible thing for him to have to say, but I didn’t use his name.

Her early pageants

I met David William through one of the actors at York. He did a Masque at Ludlow. [York led her in another direction as well.] Because I had been associated with religious drama (the Mystery Plays) I got invited to lecture at religious establishments, and from that became involved in directing pageants.   My first one was A Journey of Soy (the Spirit of Youth). I had to do the finale: “marching groups spread through the arena and a dance of joyful triumph ensues”.  I had to devise this finale with 950 girl guides and 50 boy scouts.  How long does it take 1,000 people to enter an arena?  I decided to use a farandole.  I learned a lot about using concentric circles; for example if you get four circles coming into the centre it releases a lot of space all round. If you get a lot of circles and you change the shape for the audiences to look down upon. And if you get two groups coming together it creates a different shape again. The patterning of these groups was really quite something.

 

I learned quite a different thing from a pageant celebrating the history of Rochester Cathedral. I learned something there.  One is always learning.  I had to go to a works factory in Dartford on a freezing Sunday afternoon and when I got there they were all sitting there in their woollies and scarves and hats.  And these people were going to build Rochester cathedral – of course they didn’t look as if they were going to build anything.  

 

And I remembered a thing that I had seen of Laban’s. He had worked with the RAF during the war helping to train people with their parachute landings and with the design of parachutes. And I saw the list of things that he made for himself when he went for an interview with the RAF.  ‘Listen.’  That’s marvellous.  He wasn’t going in to tell them to do this and that, no his note was to listen to what their problems are. I have remembered this. I had to feel what they did not want to do. I had to listen to these people who did not want to get up and do anything, they didn’t want to throw off their coats and scarves. So I started them off where they were sitting and asked them to imagine that they had a tiny little nail and a tiny hammer and they were trying to hammer the nail in. And bit by bit the hammer and nail got bigger and bigger, the swings larger and larger and finally the coats came off as they started to get warmed up.  But I’m sure if I told them to take off their coats from the start it would have been dreadful.  Starting from where they were was a huge advantage.  

Historical Dance.

Alongside all these Pageants (in which I was always learning, learning, learning) I was also doing more conventional shows.  Because all these people hated Laban I wanted to get his work somehow into the ordinary theatre rather than always experimental and extraordinary.  And I think that I did manage to do that - whether in commercial theatre or on television.  A lot of what I did on television was historical dance, and there is a lot of movement content in a historical dance. I became known as the historical lady.

 

[About director Jane Howell’s production of Richard III].  At the end of the play she wanted to show how many people had died in the War of the Roses. I had been asked to create this pile of stillness. It was quite tricky to do. I didn’t want everybody rushing in and being a dead body corpse and smothering somebody underneath them. It became a kind of ritual as each member of the cast came in one after the other. [One of the most moving images I have ever seen in my life.  Impossible not to be moved.]   

What I learned very quickly about dance on television is that it is that it is always there for a purpose. It might be to part or to bring a couple together. It could be telling a story (as in Romeo and Juliette). There’s always a reason for a dance, and one has to tease out that reason. One isn’t simply doing a dance. Even if the director doesn’t know this, I have to tell them. It is part of the play, part of its construction.  

 

Interview December 13th 2000

Biography

Geraldine Stephenson was a dancer, choreographer, movement director and teacher on more than 150 films and television programmes and more than 200 stage productions. Her work was characterised by its immense range: from productions by young people to historical pageants and serious drama, with routines for The Two Ronnies along the way. She studied at Bedford College of PE where she studied with Joan Goodridge who, knowing Laban and Ullmann, encouraged Geraldine to study with them in the AMS, Manchester. In her second year she began leading morning warm-ups and soon was teaching with Laban at Esmé Church’s Northern Theatre School, Bradford. Her connection with the AMS weakened when it moved to Addlestone and she began a career of touring recitals with John Dalby. At the same time she was creating large pageants and was movement director for the 1951 revival of the York Mystery Cycle. In the 1960s she was working as a choreographer and movement director in television, film and on stage, while still directing public pageants. She was an inspiring teacher and between 2000 and 2007 took on Dick McCaw as a private pupil. 

 

Summary of Interview of December 2000

Early Education, Bedford College of Physical Education. Joan Goodrich, the Inaugural Laban Guild Winter Course in Sheffield, 1946. From Bedford to the AMS, Manchester. Students at the AMS, Manchester. Teaching at the Northern Theatre School, Civic Theatre, Bradford. Theatre Workshop, the International Dance Competition Copenhagen. Movement Director of the York Mystery Plays 1951, 1954, 1957. All’s Well That Ends Well with Trevor Nunn. On movement in general. Working with actors and dancers, a search for movement with content. The Fairie Queen.  Solo Dance Recitals in the late 1940s and 1950s. 1979 Therese an opera by John Taverner. Vaclav Havel.  Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon. In Re-Joyce with Maureen Lipman.  Working with David Giles in Television. 

 

The Interview

 

Early Education, Bedford College of Physical Education

I had always wanted to be an actress, a fact that made my father hit the roof.    For my High School Certificate I had wanted to take English and Music, but because I had to go to the college which was more scientific I took biology or something like that and music.  

 

I had just finished my High School Certificate and went to Bedford College of Physical Training and it was one the leading PT colleges then. I got into the college because my mother knew the PT teacher at my Grammar school. It was interesting because one learned a bit about Laban’s work but also because one learned physiotherapy. This was quite strenuous because in fact we were doing two full three-year trainings at the same time. But obviously the study of physiology and anatomy overlapped in both of them. In fact during the holidays I worked quite a lot in the hospitals to earn money to do more dancing. 

 

Q. The idea was that you wanted to be an actress, but since you couldn’t go to Drama School, you decided instead to go to a PT college.  

A. This was the college that my parents insisted that I go to. I went in the Autumn of 1943, towards the end of the war and graduated in July 1946. It was an interesting time because if it had been in the middle of the war I would have been a land girl or a nurse. But I got to college. It was an all women‘s college and the only time that we met men was when we had a session with the fire brigade and we had to enter a smoke filled tunnel on our knees, crawling through, with a fireman walking by our side. It was a strict college, and let me give you an example. We had to work every evening after classes which finished at 6.30, dinner was at 7.00 then you worked in your room between 8.00 – 10.00. You went out nowhere. When we heard on the radio that VE had been declared we all ran out into the gardens and began whooping with joy and prepared to celebrate, but we were sent back into our rooms to study. It was a very strict College. The Principal [Margaret Stansfeld] who was 89 was marvellous but some of the other older staff should never have been allowed to have girls in their care.  

 

Q. Although you were at college could you still pursue dancing?

 

Joan Goodrich, The Inaugural Laban Guild Winter Course 1946

I didn’t pursue it till afterwards, but during my three years there I was taught by Joan Goodrich, a fantastic teacher who she realised what my interests were. She had had a year’s training with Mary Wigman where she had been sent by the principal of the college. In January 1946 she told me and my room-mate that there was a course in Sheffield where Laban himself was teaching with Lisa Ullman, and though it was full she said there was often a chance of getting in through cancellations. So we contacted the secretary who was another member of staff at Bedford and indeed there was a cancellation and we got in. And that really was fantastic – there was such a mix of people, of all ages, shapes and sizes. All doing the work led by Laban and Lisa and someone called Lilla Bauer who had been in the Kurt Jooss Company, and Diana Jordan. All the big elements at that time were teaching at this course.  And the scales fell from my eyes. That was what made me want to do something to do with this movement. It liberated me.

 

Q. What were your first impressions of Laban as a man and as a teacher?

 

Well he was quite overpowering as a teacher. But he was very distant. In Sheffield I didn’t manage to speak to him, so he was remote to me personally; but to those he knew he was very friendly and he still had a lot of difficulty with his English even though he’d arrived in 1938, I think it was. He was very tall, or at least gave that impression – apparently he wasn’t really so tall. He was very straight and had a wonderful sense of humour – he immediately latched on to the English sense of humour. It was very ironical with lots of word-play.  Lisa Ullman never really quite latched on to the English sense of humour.   

 

The amazing thing in this course was its dynamic nature: to see people leaping in the air, throwing themselves on the ground, writhing and rolling, doing things we’d never seen. The expressiveness of it, and also the group work. The intensity of the work. There was also a woman called Sylvia Bodmer who was the third teacher in the triumvirate. The participants were from all walks of life. I had never seen such a conglomeration of such different people – all of them older than me - being so expressive and so dynamic.   But it was very much in beginning of things: although Laban had taken a few courses with Lisa before, they weren’t this big ones. And it was that year that The Laban Guild was formed. I am number 97 so it shows how many people were there at the course. This was a huge experience to be in a group, and I loved being inside the group and seeing things happening around me. Others preferred to be outside and not involve themselves. It’s possibly a psychological thing – one either prefers to be on the inside or on the outside.  

 

From Bedford to the AMS, Manchester.

While the whole thing was an inspiration, I didn’t know what do after that.  When I got back to college I only had six months left of my courses to run and I had to decide where I was going to teach PT. But of course I wasn’t going to teach PT. I never really any intention to teach. But it was then that Joan Goodrich said that Laban and Ulmann’s Art of Movement Studio was just forming in Manchester in Easter 1946. She knew them and had been teaching at the Sheffield course and so she got them both down to Bedford to see me dancing in our end of year demonstrations. Of course my parents had come down to see me as well. Joan then got my parents to meet Laban and Lisa and never did get to find out what they thought about them because they were good solid Yorkshire folk who normally never met such people. But of course there was the question of fees and so there was even more to pay out. But it was agreed then that I would go to the Studio in Autumn 1946. I went from there being 45 in our college to there being only 14 in our class at the Studio.   The atmosphere and excitement of the Sheffield course continued here. The newness and avant-garde quality of the teaching was stunning. We learned to see movement in everything – people, trees, paintings, machines – to observe the movement in how people walked, sat down, got up; how they stood when talking to each other etc. Movement for us was a heady brew as we writhed and leaped and rolled on the floor to percussion.

 

Students at the AMS, Manchester

But what is interesting is that there was Veronica Sherborne who became the great leader of therapeutic work, there was Valerie Preston Dunlop, and she became a learned authority on Laban, and Lorne Primrose who became one of the leading figures in a physical education college. All started to do Laban’s work then. All of these became very important figures in the movement.  There was also a 16-year old called Ronnie Curran and he went into the Jooss Ballet. But I had no idea what I was going to do with this training. It was a wonderful training with classes being led by Sylvia Bodmer, Laban and Lisa.  We got it fresh from the fountainhead. We learned eukinetics – the efforts - and spatial exercises with the icosahedron. And with Laban we did dance drama and – according to Valerie’s biography - he had done some of these dance dramas abroad. But he obviously adapted them because there were so few of us. We also did kinetography – the Labannotation, but I never took to that at all. The lesson were endless: there was a sort of time-table, but it was very free.

 

I did the first year as a student and wanted to stay on. But there were questions: would they have me and how could I afford the fees. I used to take an evening class in Bolton which helped at the Cesaro factory where they made frocks. It was an evening class for the workers there. But I was asked to play the piano for some of the classes in the second year as well as giving classes in anatomy and physiology and in music appreciation which I enjoyed doing. But the interesting thing in all that was that it made me think of inventive ways of teaching all these things. I learned how to improvise in my piano playing, and also wrote music which was published. We had done a lot of experiments with Sylvia Bodmer, inventing our own instruments and such like which was, at the time, very avant-garde. I worked in schools working on this movement and music work and we made six records under the title Listen and Move: there was nothing like it anywhere. 

 

Teaching at The Northern Theatre School, Civic Theatre, Bradford

I then continued into the third year – 1948 – and that was when Laban was taken very ill with Typhoid, in the Autumn and Winter. I received a message from him that I was to go and take his lessons with drama students at the Northern Theatre School in Bradford. I was terrified because I had never had anything to do with acting or actors - I knew nothing about it. In the morning I had the first years for 2 and a half hours, after lunch the second years for ninety minutes and then at 4 o clock the third years who were already in a some sort of children’s theatre group. Though I was terrified of them they were wonderful. Bernard Hepton was in this group, and a lot of this group were really very successful. Edward Petherbridge was also there when I was teaching there in my last year, 1953. I taught there five nearly years 1948 – 1953. But Laban was away between 10 weeks to three months. His only instruction to me was to limber up, do the efforts, and get them to improvise and to discuss the movement that they were using. And I got to love it.  According to Valerie Preston Dunlop’s biography, Esmee Church, the principal of the college and a great friend of Tyrone Guthrie, sent the message to Laban that I was doing fine. When he returned I became his assistant. It was because that I was at this college that I got the job at the York Mystery plays.

 

Theatre Workshop, The International Dance Competition Copenhagen

We did meet some members of Joan Littlewood’s Theatre Workshop but they shocked us a bit because they were very very revolutionary. Some of their members took part in an international dance competition in Copenhagen in summer 1947. There were groups from all over Europe. But everything went wrong for us, especially the lighting. When it was meant to be pitch black we got rosy dawn lighting. So it was just giggles from the audience: nonetheless we got an honourable mention. By that time I had got an abscess because I wasn’t eating enough fruit and vegetables. I had a two-penny pork pie every day for my lunch and an evening meal at my digs. And I was terrified that I wouldn’t get a part in this dance piece that was going to Copenhagen. I couldn’t bend my leg. 

 

Movement Director of the York Mystery Plays 1951, 1954, 1957

The Mystery Plays come about because they wanted students from Bradford to play small parts and to mingle in the crowd and for the boys to be devils, and they thought that their movement teacher should handle them. I don’t know whether Laban was asked to do – Valerie says he was – but I was asked to do it. He would never have wanted to do it – never!  I was engaged to work with Lucifer, played by an actor from London, and he was to fall down this flight of stairs – quite a big flight of stairs – whilst being chased by devils.  I was also asked to choreograph a flight of angels around the stables.  Nobody mentioned any crowd scenes. I went to York, rehearsed with the angels from Mount View School in York, met Lucifer, played by John van Eyssen – a man of great charm, which, of course you needed when playing such a part. So how could I choreograph this falling down the stairs, falling in a turning movement so that I could see where I was going? I worked out a certain pattern for the fall, sometimes with quick movements, sometimes slowed by his holding onto the railing, which allowed him to act his lines. He was game to try anything. While he was falling the devils were to tear off his white and golden robes as he tumbled down, having been smitten by God’s hand. And he landed at the bottom of the stairs in black and tattered costumes. I had also been asked to choreograph a small dance as the devils made their way from the bottom of the stairs to Hells Mouth, and this went down very well, but Martin Browne said that it was too good and would steal God’s thunder. So it was cut right down – this was my first experience of work being cut. I did the angel piece. Judy Dench was an angel, the first time placing a stool for Mary to sit in the play The Annunciation. The second time (1954) she was an angel of the Tomb, and she had a speech; and the third time (1957) she was the Virgin Mary, and she was lovely to work with. Her father played Caiaphas and her mother was the wardrobe mistress. But I found in the idea of doing all these things that I was going to have to do something with the crowd. I had never worked with 250 people before.

 

My experience of the choral movement did inform how I went about choreographing the crowd scenes. Of course it was much more stylised than it would be today – you can see that from the photographs. I absolutely loved handling the crowds, and the funny thing is that those people who studied choral movement with Laban never worked with crowds. His advice to me when working with large numbers of people was to break them down into smaller cells, each with their own leader – that way you would create separate bodies of movement. The Last Judgement was so exciting to do. It was the organisation of the saved and damned souls, as one group surged forward so another moved back: it was this sense of counter-movement which excited people so much. The devils were everywhere stopping the damned from escaping, and then chasing them into Hell. The people playing these souls took to it so well, they loved being frightened, as it were. It seemed that the devils would lift people up and thrown them into Hell’s Mouth. The saved souls were difficult because we had to figure out a way for them to walk up the steps to heaven without looking down to make sure they didn’t trip on their long skirts dresses, and of course we wanted them straight-backed looking upwards to heaven. They had to learn to how to walk with one hand holding the hem of the skirt and the other gesturing towards heaven. The first time we did it everyone wanted to be a devil.   

 

Of course I had plotted this all out on paper since it was my first time at choreographing such large numbers of people, and the Bradford students led everyone to their different places. I worked 6 weekends with them all. There were other set pieces scenes that I worked on such as the Entry into Jerusalem, the Raising of Lazarus, etc. The movement style that I chose to pursue was in no way ‘Medieval’ – how could it be when we were performing on a fixed stage beside the old abbey and the plays would originally have been performed on pageant wagons? The great window arches of the Abbey were vast.

 

This was my first professional production, working with E. Martine Browne.  He was committed to creating a revival of English poetic drama and directed all of T.S. Eliot’s plays. But he wasn’t a movement man: he would simply sit in the auditorium with his wife and watch my work. He took no part in the choreography at all and had no idea of what I was going to prior to the rehearsals. He wouldn’t have understood my plans even if I had shown him them. He was only interested in the text. There was never any arguments between us – our working relationship was very good. I was sad that I was never invited to any of the press conferences.

 

Alls Well That Ends Well with Trevor Nunn

It all began when he rang me up to invite me to work with him. I don’t know who had recommended me, but he talked quite a while on the phone about what he wanted. So I went to Stratford on Avon and met with him and Guy Woolfenden (1937-2016), the RSC Director of music. I’ll never forget this meeting, it was one of the highlights of my experience in that Trevor started to talk about what he saw. He saw a party and wanted a waltz, indeed the poster already had a couple waltzing – so he was committed to the dance. He then left Guy and to sort the waltz. Harriet Walters had to choose her partner from five suitors. When Trevor returned the real process began and this was the most exciting moment because once I had thrown in an idea, Guy would suggest a tune, Trevor would suggest a move or line, and the whole process was so spontaneous, each of us playing off the other’s ideas. The creative excitement of it all was astonishing.

 

Later I did his film Lady Jane. He never came to see any of the rehearsals – he just trusted me to get on with the job. I choreographed this rather funny masque. He came in quite early in the morning and asked me to show him what we had created. We performed it and he sat in silence and afterwards asked to see it again, once again saying nothing. I was worried by the silence and asked him if it was alright. ‘Alright? It’s brilliant.’ And I’ve never worked with him since. Typical Trevor, typical director, in fact. 

 

Movement in general. Working with actors and dancers.

Would you say that a great part of your life has been spent creating a movement vocabulary for those who have none themselves?

 

Most certainly. Laban taught you how to observe people moving. Perhaps they should crawl here, walk tall there, dart across the space there. I love working with actors and helping them find the movement for their character, or teaching them to dance; the process of getting the movement out of them and through them. Some people can’t work with actors – they say they have two left feet, but I find they bring so much to it, once they’ve got the feel of it.   Working with dancers you can quickly get the steps, because they love doing the steps and the gestures, but they are a little empty. I need then to work on the dramatic content with them. The actors already have a feel for the dramatic content and intention. But I believe that this is what all dance should have: a sense of drama and a sense of intention. I don’t know whether you’ve seen the film Billy Elliott: the little boy in that is a natural dancer. You can have a Ballet dancer who has a phenomenal technique but who isn’t a dancer, she’s moving, but there’s no real content in it. Otherwise, to me, it’s boring.  Actors often have a great deal of content in their movement. Before Laban’s influence on me I had taken lessons in Classical Ballet from the age of 4 – 16 in Yorkshire. Even if it was Ballet I suppose that my dancing had some content: you’re dancing about something, not executing something technical.  You have to know what people are people are dancing about. Actors have the content but don’t always know how to move. Laban with his effort work as much as with his spatial exercises, are responsible for my interest in the content of movement, and for my being able to work with all these different types of people – the York  Plays, Pageants, actors – professional or amateur, and of course with dancers. Doing steps is not my strongest point because of course we learned very few steps with Laban; we working in the area of bodily expression.    

 

The Faerie Queen

One of my most interesting projects was this reconstruction of Henry Purcell’s great Masque. It was produced in San Carlos Opera House in Lisbon, with a director called David William, complete with a symphony orchestra, a troupe of actors, dancers and singers. I was sent out for two weeks before to work with the San Carlos Ballet Company before the main rehearsals began. The funny thing was that I didn’t want the ballerina because in this production there would be no ballet in it. So I worked for two weeks with this company and that was an achievement, to get them working on a 17thC style masque.  We had everyone on the opera-house stage – chorus, dancers, actors, all together. We had a huge finale when everyone was holding torches I think that’s one of the most exciting things that I have done.

 

Solo Dance Recitals in the late 1950s

But I was very happy with my solo dance recitals. In 1957 we did a poetry and dance recital. In fact these performances were a result of Laban’s suggestion.  I was finding the teaching getting all too heavy and I was getting stuck with it all, and he said that what I need to do was create a solo dance recital.  This was very typical of him. Once he’s said something he doesn’t help you. He just said, ‘Do eight or nine dances, and you can show one or two to me’. And there you are, you just have to do. I didn’t know where to get dances from.  And I lived off this for some while. I toured around small theatres and arts centres with a musician [John Dalby] and an actor: it was a small-scale touring circuit set up by the Arts Council. I used to perform at a lot of colleges where the students were all studying Laban at that time. It was very popular at these theatres, and I suppose it was good for them to see what Laban’s ideas could result in - to see these ideas achieved with solos. I was proud of this. People didn’t do this kind of thing, and I learned a lot through doing it. I got invited to dance on TV. I suppose I was one of the first of what you would independent dancers: in those days anything that wasn’t ballet was peculiar - it didn’t fit in.  Actually it did fit in to this touring circuit. One of our recitals was called On Choosing a Partner: it went through different historical periods, from the medieval to the Elizabethan and so through to the eighteenth and nineteenth century, with bits of prose or a poem and I would bring in some of my dance solos like Revolution (La vengeance, Madame Defarge, from A Tale of Two Cities) Gin Lane (from the Hogarth engraving) A Danse Macabre based on the medieval plague. I had been to a course in 1949 with Mary Wigman in Switzerland where I had learned a lot about macabre movement. I did different types of angels. I used to approach these recitals from these different angles. It was unique, quite unique. At the beginning there was no contemporary dance, whereas now there is so much – a great deal of which is fantastic, though other stuff I cannot understand where they are at. Maybe this is what people thought of my early recitals.

 

The very first one was at the Studio on July 14th 1948, to students and visitors. Then I extended to The Library Theatre, Manchester and that sold out. Laban and Lisa saw the first one, but Laban didn’t comment on it. Once he’d launched you and given you the tools to work with, he didn’t say anything after that.  Later I danced at The Park Lane Theatre in London, and this was a self-promotion. I did everything myself. It was packed out! They were standing.  Maybe there were 300 – 400 seats. I knew nothing about this business, but got about it. My agent, Richard Heller was worried. I just took it in hand because that seemed to be the thing to do. You just had to take the opportunity. At first my pieces were all performed to recorded music, but eventually a pianist and composer called John Dalby joined me.  

 

1979 Therese an opera by John Taverner.  

A huge and complex opera.  As you know Taverner’s music is very difficult music to listen to and I wanted to know what the piece sounded like.   Because I was going to be doing a lot of movement in this piece I asked the director David William if there was any chance of hearing any of the music. It finished with David and I going to Taverner’s house. So there he was with his long golden hair, wearing a white suit, sat at his piano which was also white, us sitting behind him, and he played the whole of the opera on the piano. And the entirety of this grim opera was played through his long, long back: each emotional twist was conveyed through his back. Some people play instruments, but his body was so expressive.

 

Vaclav Havel

The second thing I remember was to do with Vaclav Havel and a play I did of his which was called Temptation, a kind of modern Faust.  We had got to the first night at the Other place in Stratford, a relatively small space, and I was with the director Roger Michelle. This is quite unusual because usually once the first night comes no-one has any time for the choreographer, not the actors, or the musicians. This was because the Other Place didn’t have a place for VIPs (where I wouldn’t have been invited) but just a back room. So I went there in the interval and in came Roger with two ladies from Prague – Havel was under house arrest at the time. They spoke with Havel and he said that his flat was full of violets (the flowers were an important feature in the play). He asked to be rung after the end of the show, and to talk to the actor playing Faustus. It was a wonderful feeling connecting with this writer who had written this fascinating play, and who was currently was under house arrest.  It was really weird.  

 

Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon

The next memory is about Stanley Kubrick.  I was phoned up and asked whether I would consider working on his film Barry Lyndon. I thought that it was a joke. It wasn’t. I was in the middle of doing a 13 episode television series on Edward VII and was working on episode 10, so I didn’t really mind whether I got the job or not given that I was so busy. They fly me out to Ireland on a Saturday to meet Kubrick in Dublin and then I was driven down to Waterford. I had a three hour meeting with him during which he asked me questions on every conceivable aspect of the eighteenth century. Including writing down a list of composers who were writing at the time: but with my music background I was OK on this question. I had to show him how to bow, how to courtesy, how to kiss someone’s hand. Would they do this, would they do that? I didn’t know whether I’d got the job and whether this was for information, or a job interview. I got the job and at that point the crew began to talk to me – something they hadn’t done before. Kubrick was extraordinary – these questions firing and firing at me. We got laughing a bit though he was a serious man. I needed to demonstrate certain dances and moves and used his very reluctant first assistant – much to Kubrick’s amusement. So that was the interview. Something I’d never had before nor experienced since.

 

I had to do an Irish dance and then a ballroom dance. I showed him a picture demonstrating the formal dance. “Oh, only four couples – that’ll be cheap!” To think how much money that man spends … Anyway, the ballroom dance was finally cut.  I had to work with Leonard Rossiter and teach him this dance off a video. But I really had no idea what I was going to do on the day. He was very bad with crowds – they were offal for him. Well it’s not how I work with crowds, so when I got to Waterford I begged to have an evening or two with the people who were all workers at the glass factory. Well I got my evening with them and it was wonderful. I said straight away that they must think it is crazy that an English woman should be coming over to teach them Irish jigs. I am not coming to do that. I’ve no idea what we’ll do. So I got them to show me some jigs, and got them to do a farandole, basically to get them to use space together and to get to know each other a bit. So on the day the whole hundred of them all of them were in this huge meadow with mountains in the background. As Rossiter and Gaye Hamilton were doing this very odd jig he wanted all the extras to stand in twos spread evenly throughout the meadow and of course at the end of the meadow they were knee deep in grass and could hardly move. But because we’d had that evening together we got on really well. You see you can’t take a whole bunch of people whom you haven’t worked with before and when you don’t know what you’re going to be doing. I always try to relate with people beforehand.  

 

I was one of the few people who have ever said no to Kubrick. He kept asking Rossiter to repeat his jig and I could see that if he did it once more, he would have a heart attack. I wouldn’t let them do it again. I can’t remember the other thing – something to do with the sun being in their eyes. I think he liked me for that. The cheek of me. The job is looking after the people who are dancing.  I think that you get the best out of people if you don’t impose on people. But it’s also for myself. I like to know who I’m working with – what my material is.  If you can remember a few names it works better all the way round.  

 

And it paid dividends because of course he didn’t give two hoots about them and how they might be feeling. And of course I could dart through the meadow like a scalded cat.  Whenever I work with new dancers I always like them to know where the canteen is, where the loos are, etc. This goes back to a time when I had been working at Alexendra Palace and had been left alone all day – without knowing where anything was. I had felt so lonely, so awful. I’d been there all day and wasn’t called until 6.00 in the evening.  

In Re-Joyce with Maureen Lipman.  

I adored working with her – she was wonderful to work with because she is so inventive, so willing. She and Edward Petherbridge are my favourite actors because they will just try. Some actors say that ‘They’d never do that’, but they don’t know until they try.  So, Maureen and I sailed along.  We had a few difficulties with the director. Then three days before we opened I had my fall and broke both my wrists and was in hospital. So I discharged myself and went to Farnham where we were opening: it was important to be there because Maureen likes a lot of support.  And being a one-woman show, the pianist was a man, the director was a man, so she need a woman’s company.

 

Working with David Giles in Television

Should I get testimonials from David Giles, Maureen Lipman and Edward Petherbridge?  David Giles was the director of the first historical television series in colour.  I’d just finished a job in Kenilworth and someone mentioned that Vanity Fair was going to be made into a series and that I should contact the director David Giles.  I had taught him at the Northern School of Theatre in Bradford, so, for the first time, I broke my rule about not using old students.  So I wrote to David and asked him if he would bear me in mind. Within in three days he phoned and said, ‘Thank God you’ve written in, I didn’t have a clue to who was going to do the choreography’. Since that was the period when these huge historical pieces were being made, this was the beginning of a lot of work for me. 

 

Interview on 21st July 2003

Summary of Interview

Sylvia Bodmer: her use of percussion in dance; group dance, the Manchester Dance Circle. Her dance piece made for a competition in Copenhagen in 1947. Lisa Ullmann: how she moves, how she teaches. A workshop in Switzerland with Rosalia Chladek, Mary Wigman, Harald Kreuzberg, Kurt Jooss, Hans Zullig in 1949. Description on the styles and contents of their teaching. Joan Goodrich and her teaching at Bedford College of FE and with Laban’s courses. Mary Elding - a student at the Arts of Movement Studio. About exercises GS taught Dick McCaw: sideways successive, the Wave. The principle of ‘Bend, Stretch, Twist’. Teaching Dick McCaw to move.  

The Interview

Sylvia Bodmer. 

Sylvia was quite an extraordinary woman. She was not like anybody else. She was very difficult to follow because of her English – her son Sir Walter Bodmer takes her off wonderfully. You couldn’t understand what she wanted since she this accent and she spoke very fast. Even her voice was curious. She moved around a lot as she taught, demonstrating as she went. She did get what she wanted. It seemed that she was vague but it wasn’t – once you got used to her. She always seemed to be in disorder but out of it came order. She wanted to get people dancing in harmony together.   

I think it was because Sylvia and her husband moved to Manchester that Lisa UIlmann went to join them there to form the Art of Movement Studio in January 1946. 

She had us doing extraordinary movement to extraordinary music. Often I didn’t agree with what we were doing but who was I to argue? I was a student learning all this for the first time. In the long run the two things that I learned form her were. The first concerned percussion and rhythm. She had us making percussion with drums, triangles, kitchen implements, all sorts of things like that – long before that sport of thing was done in this country, as far as I know. It really stirred me up and made me very creative with my dancing because I was so excited by the use of the percussion. She used to employ rhythms that we were not familiar with – 123 123 12, for example. Some of the students would sometimes play instruments and others of us move about as we felt. I did a lot of percussive work with students later on when I began to teach. I took over a lot of the percussion work when we moved to Addlestone: we did a lot of interesting work. The boys loved this work.  All this was inspired by Sylvia.  

The second thing that she did was group dance.  As Laban had said, she argued that since people came together to sing why not to dance?  With the very limited number of people we had in the studio – 14 when I started – it was difficult to do anything in the way of real movement choirs. But there was an evening class – the Manchester Dance Circle - every Monday night at Birchfield School Hall, which Sylvia mainly taught at where there would be about 40 or us. Then we could get into the feeling of movement choirs. I loved it because I liked to be in the middle of things with other people. Some didn’t like for that same reason – they wanted to be more on their own. She did very simple things, for example with the dimensional scale, so as one group would go up another went down. One group would narrow in as another would widen out and travel round. For me it was the beginning of learning how to manage groups of people – of course at the time I didn’t know that I would end up working with such large groups of people. She set me on that path – she was a master at it. She choreographed a very odd ballet piece for a competition in Copenhagen in 1947 which was at the ends of my first year there. It had nightmares and weird creatures, and something that I’d never done before: it was a sort of movement choir – but we did need a lot more people. We had to borrow men from the Theatre Workshop because we had so few in our own group.  

Lisa Ullmann

Lisa coached the dancers at the Ballet Jooss in technique and movement and came to Dartington with them when they came over in 1935.  

She had a most awkward figure, quite plump, wide hips and thighs. This didn’t matter when she moved – she had a special flexibility about her. She moved beautifully – I had never seen anything like it. She had a magic about her teaching, a very determined magic. I first saw her in January 1946 in Sheffield where she was giving a course with Laban. She had something special about. It was she who turned me on to do Laban work. She used to do what she called dance studies. One of her big things then was working on the movement scales. Time didn’t seem to matter when she taught, the lesson finished once she had got out of you what she wanted to get.  

When taught the scales and efforts they were oriented more towards dance whereas Laban stressed the effort elements – he adored getting us to fly in the diagonal scale [in the first movement to high right which is associated with floating]. He used to focus more on actions than dance. He went more into drama.  

A workshop in Switzerland Chladek, Wigman, Kreuzberg, Jooss, Zuelig in 1949

I knew nothing about Chladek before arriving but in the information in the brochure it said that her lessons would focus on elevation. Now I was a great leaper in my youth and wanted to know more about how you jump, turn as you were jumping – all the different ways of jumping. What I didn’t know was that all the exercises would be on the floor focusing on strengthening our legs. Each lesson was spent either sitting or lying on our backs doing these leg exercises. We couldn’t understand what she was saying – she taught in German - and if we English students would lift our heads she would shout, ‘Down’!. Only on the very last day were we allowed to do little leaps across the diagonal of the room. What she did was marvellous for elevation. When I got back to Manchester and told Lisa and Laban what I’d been doing, he latched on to these Chladek exercises.   He used these for the training – even thought we didn’t do much training at the Studio.   Laban never hesitated to use something good that somebody else had brought along.  

I adored Wigman’s classes. She was a very charismatic person. She had a haunted face. She also had a wonderful pianist – I had never heard music played like that. She had two aspects of movement. One was very dramatic – even melodramatic - dynamic and very intense. The other was very sentimental – I didn’t like this at all; the other I was fascinated by. She did one session only on turning, which I adored because I loved spinning around. By the end of the hour there were only about three people standing because of all the turning. She certainly awakened in me things that I used later in my solo recitals. There was a macabre air about some of things that she did. People adored her, they worshipped her. She was very friendly.  

Kreuzberg shaved his head - he was completely bald and used to wear a satin or satin-finish high-necked shirt with black trousers. He was a like a panther – so mobile. He spoke very little but he did these movements down the room: going out sideways, leaping forwards. He was so fluid. He got us all dancing: I felt liberated by his work. The contrast between Chaldek and Kreuzberg and Wigman was enormous. One could see in Wigman’s dancing that she had worked with Laban.

Jooss was a disappointment as a teacher. What I remember mainly from the sessions that he gave was being taught the part of Death in The Green Table. We found this very difficult to do. But he was not a teacher. But it was interesting hearing him talk. Zullig I can’t remember at all.  

Joan Goodrich

Joan was a teacher at the College of Physical Education In Bedford where I went between 1943 ands 1946, training to become a PE teacher. My teacher at High School in Hull had been to Bedford and had suggested that I go to this college because they taught a very interesting type of dance. This is what got me there in the first place.   What I understand is that Miss Stansfeld who was the principal and founder of the college and very open-minded had got Joan to study with Wigman for three months and then bring back what she learned. I find the idea of this very proper English woman doing Wigman’s expressive, dramatic dance quite extraordinary, but there you have it.   This switched her on to the Laban work.  

From my first lesson with Miss Goodrich I knew that there was something very interesting here. We did different movements coming up and down the room as well as twisting. These were very un-balletic movements. We also used to do flowing successive movements out from the centre to the periphery. Having only ever done classical ballet and Greek dance I had no experience of this kind of movement. At the end of the term she would do dances with us that were different to anything that we had ever done.  These dances were very dramatic. We danced with partners, or two, three, even four people. I had never created dances in little groups. We made movements near the ground, almost like writhing on the ground, then leaped into the air. It was a revelation to find that you could dance with other people and use all the space around you including the ground: that you could roll on the ground. We were encouraged to invent. But we never just learned how to move, there was always an expressive dimension to it. She could be caustic with students who weren’t good at dance. Of course it was Joan Goodrich who in my last year at the college recommended that I should go to a New Year course in Sheffield led by Laban and Ullmann. She spurred me on enormously, not least by inviting Laban and Ullmann to see my final piece in the Summer term. By chance my parents were in Bedford to see the End of Year performance, and met Laban and Ullmann – I don’t know what they spoke about. But the upshot was that I enrolled at the Art of Movement Studio in Manchester. Joan used to come and give lessons at the Studio sometimes.  

Mary Elding - a student at the Arts of Movement Studio

I remember Mary Elding, she is still a friend.  She was a very deep mover, while I am a high mover (although I do love getting down onto the lower plane of movement).  While I move from what Laban calls a centre of levity, she moves from her centre of gravity.  Mary was also at the Sheffield course in January 1946: an actress-dancer she was there will three other actors. She wouldn’t accept that she was an influence on me, but I was impressed by her wonderful movement. I can’t remember any other students.

Exercises

Sideways Successive

I first came across successive movement from Joan Goodrich. It is one of the things which alerted me to this ‘Central European Dance’ being so different from the Classical Ballet of my time. Then you would never dream of push your ribcage out and then following the movement out through your arms. The torso was always held as one unit.   To move the ribs at all was astonishing. It was a wonderful feeling to flow through ribs, shoulder, elbows, wrists, fingers. We also made upward successive movements. This movement is good for warming up. It also improves your ability to move and to dance. It develops your vocabulary, allowing you to progress to other movements.  

The Wave – a successive movement in the saggital plane

I also learned this at Bedford with Joan Goodrich. This movement gets the whole body alerted.  It’s not just a physical exercise it can become quite expressive if you want – it can become a real dance in itself. We used the Wave a lot at the Studio, trying to get our knees as close to the ground as possible. I’ve got more out of this movement by teaching it – both to yourself and others – since I left the studio. It has become more meaningful to more. When we did it at the Studio it was a very physical thing, a kind of warm up. It is a very good exercise for bending – it bends you backwards and curves you forwards - and stretching the body. When you bring your arms over the top, and as you feel for the air with the soft skin of your arms you move forward with your feet trying to avoid any kind of heavy or plodding step – there is a quality of movement that people enjoy doing. One tries to achieve a gliding (direct, sustained, light) quality of movement, even though it quite hard to do. Even though you are bringing your weight down into the ground you must sustain a lightness in the step and in the arms. Far from being a ‘physical jerks’ exercise, the Wave has a poetry about it – one that can be understood in terms of the Laban (beginning by pressing and ending with gliding, beginning with a bound flow and ending with free flow). It is about how you use the body.  

Bend Stretch Twist

This is one of the basic principles of movement – but only in the limited sense of what you can do with your bones and muscles. It doesn’t begin to talk about movement qualities. You may start with the mechanical side of the movement but gradually you start thinking about the quality, the ‘how’ of the movement. 

Teaching McCaw how to move

When I met him in 1999 he was very much in one piece from shoulder to hips. He was very stiff, and didn’t look at all mobile in the spine from the head down to the pelvis. It seemed that this straight back was a sign that he wouldn’t give in to things. I felt that that would need a lot of work. Twisting was very necessary in order to make him more malleable. It is often a difficulty in people. In order for him to move more articulately I needed to break up his spine into different areas that could move independently of each other. Most particularly I felt that there was no give in the thoracic spine – as is the case with many men. They feel that they have to be in command – more than with women.  They hold themselves in their thoracic spine very stiffly: they are very ‘bound’ (in Laban’s sense of the word). Possibly because I am a ‘high mover’ I am more fluid in the upper spine, but I think that most movement teachers would also want this ease. Maybe a low mover would concentrate more on the hips. We’ve not done much on hips really.   

Interview July 24th 2003

Summary of Interview

Improvisation at the AMS, Manchester and the relation with dance and choreography. Martha Graham’s first performances in London. The Effort Elements and the movement vocabulary it opens. Examples of her approach to choreography – how she got movement out of people: a pageant for Rochester Cathedral, a piece with John Dalby, Natasha’s dance in a television adaptation of War and Peace, a massive pageant for the Girl Guides, the York Mystery Plays. Historical dance for TV and how to help actors move naturally. How GS created her Dance Solos in the late ‘40s and ‘50s. The first students at the Studio in 1946. Aspects of Laban’s teaching: the Diagonal Scale and the Scales of the Icosahedron. She preferred the Efforts. ‘Body Parts’ was one of Laban’s favourite exercises. Gathering and Scattering, the Wave, the Structure and Content of Lessons with Dick McCaw. A repetition of earlier material, much interesting comments on the use of music in learning movement. Final reflections on Lisa Ullmann’s teaching. 

The Interview

Improvisation at the AMS, Manchester

When I was at the Studio we never actually learned anything about choreography.  We didn't do it all, but what we did do was an enormous amount of improvising with Laban where we might move about the Studio pressing and flicking. Or we might dance/move with a partner in a sequence of movements which played upon High and Low planes of elevation. Then we would create a duet and as we all performed these duets to each other Laban would comment upon them. Nothing was ever wrong so he gave us enormous confidence. 

With Lisa, apart from doing dances, we used to improvise on space studies: for example, the three rings and five rings of the icosahedron. With Sylvia we did group dances or what we later called movement choirs. One of the things that helped me most in the choreography that I did afterwards was all this improvisation because we all became so versatile. Laban made sure that we didn't all do the convenient movements that we all liked. We were made to do the movements that we felt were not natural for us. As we improvised we were actually composing choreography.  

I liked doing things with steps and we didn’t do much of that in the Studio: we might have made up a few exercises with steps, but not often. I could have done with a lot more of that. I like using my legs with different steps. When I would work on dances in my later professional life my legs were so good with steps because I’ve never really learned how. It was all body stuff but not actually dancing with the legs. The body-based work was more suited to drama than dance. And of course I began teaching in Bradford very early on – when I was still a student myself – so I began by thinking about adapting exercises for actors rather than dancers. Everything that I learned was very quickly adapted for my teaching of acting students. If it had been a dance school it would have been different – I might have got into using steps. When the Studio had moved to Addlestone Robin Howard who ran the London Contemporary Dance School wanted some Laban work and Lisa asked me to do classes there. I was a total failure for them because they were all so immersed in Martha Graham’s approach, that I couldn’t make any inroads. They were all bound, low movers. I remember that Richard Alston was interested but he was only one of two who were. When Graham first performed on England almost nobody came to see her: there was Robert Helpern and Audrey Hepburn. I went to almost every performance, I was fascinated.  

The Effort Elements

With Laban we used to work a great deal on the efforts and their elements of Weight, Space, Time and Flow. Maybe time is the easiest to describe since we can understand how there are dancers who move quickly and are agile while others are much slower. We would make up studies which began slow and then accelerated.  Or we would work with weight, going from strong to light movements. Very often we would writhe on the ground, twisting and turning with strength. We worked in small groups creating small composition based on these effort themes. In terms of space I was a very direct mover, I liked doing movements in straight lines: the opposite of this is flexible, and of course there is every degree in between. In Ballet and the popular dance of 1940s Britain there was a lot of direct movement, but very little indirect or flexible. There was little flexibility in the body or in the patterns. This was a totally new idea to me when I came across Laban in Sheffield in 1946 - all this twisting and writhing. I absolutely loved it. The final element was Flow - free and bound. This about the degree of control in one's movement, they are very careful in everything that they do. Others flow all over the space. We called these the efforts because we couldn't find a better word to describe this effort of moving. This has been a life-long vocabulary of movement. We used it to observe how people moved in the street - were they strong or light? And so on. I did take away a certain ability to observe people in their movements and this helped me in my teaching. It helped in my choreography because I wasn't just looking for the right move but something that was true to real life.   

I took away this vocabulary of movement from the studio and it has sustained me all these years. Certainly when I was creating my solo dances the improvisation was hugely helpful. The thing about the Efforts was that it was something in your body rather than in your head. You had to move, move, move.  

Choreography and Teaching

To me choreographing is so close to teaching because within a choreography you have to teach people a lot of things. I found that through being aware of the efforts I would notice how people were at the beginning of a rehearsal even though I'd never met them. I'd liked to mention two or three moments in rehearsal. These are all examples of how one begins to work with people. The first was on a Sunday in Rochester when we were rehearsing for a pageant celebrating the building of Rochester cathedral. The process was one of getting them to move gradually from where they were sitting. I drew them out. 

The second was during a rehearsal of a musical by John Dalby. This group of mainly young people had been learning a song, standing or sitting for nearly an hour. When it came to my dance rehearsal they were bursting to move. They went mad in free-flow dancing. I used some of their movement energy but this was an entirely different starting point from the Rochester rehearsal. I gave them plenty of chance to use the floor and each other. They were full of the atmosphere.

The next example is Natasha's Dance from War and Peace. She goes out hunting with the peasants and comes in still wild from the countryside and the hunting, really full of sex. She is roused and does this dance and Tolstoy says that this dance is unteachable, inimitable. It is Russian. So one has to teach a dance that has this quality. The actress Morag Hood had to perform this dance and found it extremely difficult, it was totally opposite to her natural temperament. I started her off by getting her to stamp on the ground, feeling the earth, then turning. I wanted her to feel the heaviness and strength. Then I said that there was a charming man over there and she had to dance for him - do what you like. Gradually we built up a solo, but started from giving her one or two movement ideas and seeing what she would do with them.  You couldn't begin by teaching a few steps. It was a development from the scene and trying to get in the qualities of that scene - the weather, the hunt, and so forth. It had been a year since she'd seen André and she had this pent-up longing for men, for sex. We started with movement rather than steps. Of course at this time one had to include the five or six cameras into the choreography since they were like ice-cream vans moving through the dancers. This was before the era of steady-cams that could be held on the shoulder.  

My next example is a pageant that I did with Girl Guides in 1960 called The Journey of SOY (Spirit of Youth). The instructions for the final dance were 'Marching groups spread through the arena and a joyful triumph ensues. There were a thousand people doing this dance and I'd never worked with so many. The Girl Guides were already divided into areas of London but how to get them into the Wembley Arena without bumping into each other? How could they all enter? I drew the space patterns - the shape of a Farandole - for the entrances. Jooss used this same in his Dance of Death at the end of The Green Table. A Farandole is a vital dance for a choreographer to know. It dates back to medieval times where it was performed on the village green and it used to go through the back lanes and even through the houses. So each group of 70 to 100 Girl Guides at a time had their own pathway in the space. That was the most difficult part of the dance. Sometimes when they got there they would break away and move freely into the arena. I have used the Farandole many, many times since then.  

The largest number of people I had had to choreograph before that had been 250 in the York Mystery Plays when Laban had advised me how to deal with such a large group: divide them into smaller groups each with a leader. There were several large scenes: the Last Judgement, Christ's Entry into Jerusalem, the Harrowing off Hell, the Raising of Lazarus. The male students from the Northern School of Theatre in Bradford were the leaders of the groups. I was always left by E. Martin Browne to do the movement for the plays, and in the Last Judgement he wanted me to get some people climbing the staircase up to Heaven, and some of them to be pushed into Hell by the Devils. I asked for a show of hands for volunteers to be Good Souls: there were about three people. Everybody wanted to be a Bad Soul. The ascension to Heaven was difficult for the women because they all had long skirts which they would lift up whilst looking down to make sure of their steps: the feeling of the movement was a lifting up of the Soul as they rise to God in Heaven! We had to practise going up the stairs whilst looking upward - which was quite tricky. This to me is as much about teaching as it is about creating. Whether members of the public or professional actors my job is often to help them overcome their fear of dance - they don't want to look foolish. So one has to teach them.  

When I began to be engaged to do dances for TV I was asked to do historical dances which isn't something we'd done at the Studio with Laban. I had to learn a lot about historical dances, not just the steps but their quality, the reason for the dance. If I couldn't find out why they were dancing a particular dance then I would invent one.  It came down to understanding certain types of movement behaviour which comes back to character and the costume of the period. You can only do certain movements in long, flowing robes.  People think that you just do a dance but for me there's a lot more to it: your relationship with your partner, your relationship to the group: one might be dancing with one partner whilst eyeing up someone else. This is what distinguishes Dance Theatre - which is about social behaviour - from Classical Ballet.

When teaching actors who need to learn a dance for television I always begin by teaching them how to use the space that is there, how to fill and empty a space, how to cross a space. It was about getting a feeling of space. I also had to be very careful that they didn't look like dancers, they had to look like people: in War and Peace one of the producers had said just this - 'Get your dancers to look less like dancers and more like people!' Actors have to learn to dance like their character: this is again where effort comes in. I would use effort terms to help the actor get the right character dynamic for the dance.  

Laban's work helped me to realise that historical dances were danced by people and not just by dancers.  What were the people like in the time off a particular dance?  I believe you could teach history through dance. For example, the aristocratic waltz which was light, gliding, moving from the centre of levity originated in the earthy, pressing, downward-moving Landler of the German peasants. The waltz had an enormously long life - almost 150 years. Throughout all of my work in historical dance and pageants I have been guided by Laban's notions of the Efforts and of Dance Theatre. I have been used to choreograph such a wide variety of dance because directors knew that I understand what was needed to be brought into the play. That is thanks to Laban: being able to know how to help actors is thanks to Laban. It wasn't just a matter of learning steps, much more about the character of the period.  

How GS created her Dance Solos

When working at the Studio, on Thursdays Laban and I would travel from Manchester to Bradford to teach at the Northern Theatre School. One day when we were coming back and I was exhausted from my teaching I asked him what I should do. He replied that I needed to prepare a Solo Dance Recital. I hadn't ever done a solo. I was taken aback at having to do even more work but he was right: I did need to look after myself and not just after the students. I didn't know where to start but began by creating The Angel of Prayer. I'd been to York Minster these wonderful statues of Angels with their different hand positions.  It was flowing and statuesque.  In contrast to that I created The Bringer of Death which was a very strong dynamic stamping dance using Holst's Bringer of War from The Planets. It was very much earth-bound, strong, thrusting, pressing - totally different movement qualities to the Angel of Prayer.  I can't remember Laban's reaction - he seemed to like them.  I then created the angels of Mercy and Sorrow, but they weren't really angels but movement qualities. Then I turned to something quite different: The Student. She was very floppy. Later I found different characters from history, in Revolution I played Madame Defarge and Vengeance - that was about knitting with thrusting movements.  I also did characters from Hogarth's Gin Lane. The awareness of space and of the Efforts helped me produce these characters, these dances.  

The first students at the Studio in 1946

I've worked with miners, barristers who never stopped talking - all kinds of people.  This reflects the odd lot of people that I met in the Laban Guild course in Sheffield in 1946 and later in the Studio. In the Studio we had two professional dancers, one from Switzerland and one from Norway. Then there were two people who came as part of their therapy. Another boy [Ronnie Curran] had been a shepherd in Scotland - he ended up in the Ballets Jooss. A former teacher from Bedford was there along with Veronica Sherborne, the leader of the therapeutic application of Laban work. We were all so different: shapes, sizes and backgrounds. I am sure that having improvised with them enabled me to work with such a wide range of people in my later professional life. Laban got on well with people, he had a gift of getting movement out of them. He could also shout and be very strong: he would sometimes shout, ‘More! More!’

The Diagonal Scale

His great passion was the diagonal which was so mobile.  He used to get us flying across the diagonal of the studio. He did do set movements from time to time. Once we did the diagonal for three hours, and in the first diagonal he made us really go down into the ground. The following day none of us could walk up or down stairs. It was like being driven as if one was at the Ballet. He liked driving people. We used to do the diagonal scale in a much more violent way than you do in our classes. We were trained and could do this. We could fly up to High Right and then the big thing was coming to Low Left, we had to go right down. This was where he was really tough. This was also a very good body training: bending, stretching, twisting. His instruction to us was always, 'Go!' We certainly did the scales to alert, to train the body, but maybe there were other reasons.  

Icosahedron

This embraces the three planes of movement: Door, Table and Wheel. By defining these points in space he gave us wider movement experience.

I don't remember Laban doing the rings, Lisa did those from the point of view of making dance. I think this awareness of space helped us in our improvisations.  Laban wasn't quite so 'Dancey'. However, all of this came from his vision of space. Some of the students adored the spatial exercises, though this was never my speciality: I was more drawn to the Efforts. I found the spatial exercises very abstract.  In the sort of work - mostly working with actors - that I've been doing all my life, the scales and choreutics have not been so necessary. I did the A-scale at Bradford but it didn't mean a lot to me. Maybe because I didn't teach it properly. I am sure that I did the planes with them. Bernard Hepton certainly remembers the Efforts.  

There were two very different things being taught at the Studio: on the one hand the Eukinetics, that is the Efforts which were more dramatic, and on the other the more abstract and mathematical Choreutics, or space harmonies which led more to dance.  

Body Parts

This was one of Laban's favourite exercises. He would ask you to lead a movement with a particular part of your body. Then you'd work with a partner. Once again we were improvising. We'd work at all levels - high, middle and low. This was about developing a body awareness. I haven't done much of this with you because there is only one of you, but it is a hugely important aspect of his teaching. Another exercise is to write your name with a part of your body - we used to do this with Laban.  Margaret Dunn and Diana Jordan - they learned with Laban at Summer Schools not at the Studio - also developed this kind of approach in their teaching in colleges throughout the North.   

[Second Minidisc]

The Selection of Exercises

I couldn’t have begun teaching you by only doing improvisations. We had to have certain exercises to address you specific needs – your inability to twist, your rigid spine, your weak legs. But you must remember that Laban taught in groups and I am working with you as one individual in a class. This is a good list of exercises to get anybody moving although there is no fixed order for them. Although the Chladek exercises are meant to be a preparation for jumping, we haven’t jumped because you are not yet strong enough, we have to careful because you don’t have much experience of movement.  

All these exercises are valuable in developing a sense of Bend Stretch Twist and Flow. They are not necessarily expressive although feeling does come in varying degrees. What I find extraordinary in the Studio is the fact that we didn’t do many fixed exercises, it was mostly improvisation. We did the scales, Gathering and Scattering, Whipping and Wringing, the Wave, but not many other fixed exercises – and there was never any fixed order. There was no structure whereby we began with such and such a thing, and then went on to the next. I think that exercises like the Wave were done as purely physical exercises in the Studio whereas I like to make it into more of an artistic action: this happens when you get an entire class moving, one line after another making the wave. I don’t remember doing the Wave like that at the Studio.  I used to love doing the Wave at the Studio.

Gathering and Scattering

While something like gathering and scattering is quite aesthetic and demands that you are aware of the sensation of your making these two actions, the Chladek exercises are purely physical. The gathering and scattering has a feeling about it and you need to feel the air on the surface of your skin. We must work more on the arms and how you touch the air, just as we worked on the gliding of the arms through the air in the Wave. Of course you cannot begin teaching an exercise like this with such subtleties – that comes much later. You get to the arms later, and with such refinements you begin realise how valuable an exercise this is. Maybe it isn’t an artistic study in its own right, but it has to be done with feeling. By doing this movement frequently you realise how it can be done better. But as with all movement exercises, you can’t do everything all at once. I believe in doing several different things and gradually making them all better.   

Structure and Content of Lessons

I don’t teach you the same exercises every week because I think the pupil might lose interest in it – it is important to remember the law of diminishing returns.  This is why I mix and match exercises in every lesson. I am also concerned in each lesson that the body gets warmed up properly, thus more demanding exercises will be left towards the end of the lesson.  You will note from your second book that there are far more exercises and that we are focusing more closely on some that I consider to be centrally important. 

Training

When I took over the training in 1949 there was a certain order to the exercises probably because of how I had been taught to teach at Bedford. I had teach to all these students who came in from the Ministry of Education along with the freelance ones. Laban did go through all this with me, though I can’t remember exactly how.  The students enjoyed this immensely because they knew what they were meant to be doing, they were being taught something. Laban’s way was you to discover things through improvisation and this worked extremely well.   

In our work I would only say that Chladek was actually training: the rest of the exercises have an improvisational and artistic feel to them. One reason for Laban’s courses becoming a little more structured was that in order to be accredited he needed to be inspected by the Ministry of Education and this required that there be more of a fixed curriculum. They paid for students to come to the Studio and therefore required certain standards. Possibly because I had trained at a College for Physical Training, I was put in charge of the training aspect of the Studio. That is possibly one of the first things that I was asked to do. There was also the fact that neither Lisa nor Laban liked teaching early in the morning so my morning trainings allowed them to sleep in.  

The Thoracic Spine

Normally the upper is a bit stuck, it is rigid and inflexible. People who work in offices all day have rather clumped spines: they lift their arms but don’t think of lifting the spine with their arms, it is a part of their body that is left out. In everyday life the chest, even the whole trunk, is often very contracted. So one needs to stretch and twist it – one needs to devise specific actions. Without this you will never get movement through the whole body. 

Successiveness 

Related to the thoracic spine is the principle of successiveness, and I learned about this when at Bedford – it was what alerted me to the fact that this type of dance was so different to Classical Ballet. The Ballet spine was in those days stretched but never twisted. This new principle of movement that worked out through ribs, shoulder, elbow, wrists, fingers was something that was amazing to me in Bedford and was continued in work at the Studio. I remember that we had a lot of difficulty with the men in these exercises – they felt it was a bit effeminate.  In those days men didn’t think of arm movements being about anything other than strength.  They had to find this difficult movement.  Successiveness is very much associated with flow: you cannot have a flowing movement unless you can move successively, and you cannot be successive without this feeling for flow, this feeling of flowing.  

Bend Stretch Twist

This has been the basis of my teaching with you.  In order to be able to get a full bend, stretch, twist you have to work on certain areas of the body before you can get to the one on which you want to work.  We have had to work a lot on your legs, but also on your spine, before being able to work on your arms.   With this comes the very important notion of flow: before we starting working together you were very bound.  Once again, men at the Studio were at first very resistant to free flow which they thought was effeminate.  Even in the case of twisting, we first had to work on the bending and stretching.   It all depends on the body of the person you are working in.   

The Scales

While the A and B scales don’t mean a great deal to me I love the way that we do the Dimensional Scale, it has a very calming effect upon me. And I love the diagonal because of it feeling of flowing – I am a very flowing person.  

Swinging

Laban had three types of moving: swing, impulse, impact.  When you swing you need to allow your head to go with the rest of the body, and this was something you couldn’t do when I first met you.  Your neck was very stiff and your chin stuck out.   

Music 

Although we do a lot of exercises with me counting for, I also feel it is important to do exercises to music.  It helps with the flow of the exercise.  The music also helps you create a relationship with somebody – for example when you and I do Side, Side, Behind, Side, Front to waltz music. I feel that music creates a bit of variety in the movement. There are some exercises which aren’t so suited to music accompaniment – say, the Wave.  You and I have tried this and it didn’t work. I also use different pieces of music to elicit different types of movement. At the Studio we nearly always had a pianist who improvised and this provided a backing for the movement. The music could adapt to the movement, whereas we have to adapt to the music. They would improvise as they watched the movement. If I had a pianist I would use music a lot more in your classes; I think it supports and helps the movement along.  I used to play the piano at the Studio and though I had never before improvised I suddenly found that I could! I can only think that is the movement work which released lots of things inside me. It was after these musical improvisations that I began to write some music, and indeed published some records for educational purposes.   

Laban was completely insensitive to music, he didn’t used it much at all. He didn’t hesitate to stop the music in a play in the middle of a phrase – he’d stop anywhere. I curled up at some of things that he did. I don’t think he was very musical. Lisa and Sylvia were much more musical and used music very well. In my early dance solos I had to select music for the dances. The Angel of Prayer really happened because I had heard this beautiful piece by Bach. Hearing the piece started me off wanting to make the piece. The same thing went for the The Bringer of Death – when I head the Mars music from Holst’s The Planets. Music stimulated me enormously. 

Lisa Ullmann

The thing about Lisa is that she had a magic that you cannot explain. People would be bewitched by her.  At the Summer Schools they adored her.  You could hear a pin drop when she taught. I can’t put my finger on this quality of her, though I have often tried: how do you explain magic?  She had a wonderful eye for detail; she was a very attentive teacher, alert to everything in a class.  She was very patient with students.  She used a lot of music when she taught she was very sensitive to music. She had a wonderful sense of timing whether it was metrical or not.  Once we did a performance of work from the Studio in the Intimate Theatre in Manchester and she did a couple of solos, and they were beautifully danced. Although she carried a lot of weight she knew how to move it. Laban didn’t have that kind of magic. He was a genius. The two of them together were incredible – they worked well together because they were so different. I am sure that it was she who won over the educational Department in Manchester, her and Myfanwy Dewy who was an HMI.   

She was more oriented towards dance in her classes. She wasn’t a drama person like Laban. She wasn’t interested in my solo performances, not in the slightest bit: firstly because they were more on the drama side, secondly because she was more interested in the teaching. Sylvia was much more interested in performance.

 

Contact us

bottom of page